Nominal yield is the least useful number in this report. The useful parts are utilisation, the source of the return, and the spread over a real reference rate.
Every level below is recomputed for the week ending 4 October 2026 from per-pool historical data, so the comparison column genuinely reflects the prior week rather than a later snapshot. Rate moves of a few basis points should be read as noise; anything beyond roughly half a point is worth explaining — and this week there is nothing beyond half a point to explain, which is itself the finding.
Quick answer
Where were DeFi yields highest in the week ending 4 October 2026? Arbitrum again offered the highest stablecoin lending rate among tracked chains at 5.20% TVL-weighted, ahead of Base at 4.62% and Ethereum at 4.21%. Solana staking held at 4.91%. Judged as a spread over the tokenized T-bill reference of 3.45%, Arbitrum again paid the widest premium — as it has in every week of our archive.
1 Yield dashboard
2 Week-over-week comparison
| Aggregate | Week ending 2026-09-27 | Week ending 2026-10-04 | Change | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum stablecoin lending | 4.17% | 4.21% | +0.04pp | Deepest pool set in the sample |
| Tokenized T-bill funds | 3.43% | 3.45% | +0.02pp | The reference rate every other row is judged against |
| ETH liquid staking | 2.18% | 2.19% | +0.01pp | Pure staking venues; lending collateral excluded |
| Solana staking | 4.89% | 4.91% | +0.02pp | Includes MEV and priority-fee components |
| Blended stablecoin, all chains | 4.11% | 4.14% | +0.03pp | TVL-weighted across tracked chains |
| Base stablecoin lending | 4.65% | 4.62% | -0.03pp | Smaller pool set |
| Arbitrum stablecoin lending | 5.22% | 5.20% | -0.02pp | Smaller pool set |
| BSC stablecoin lending | 3.08% | 3.12% | +0.04pp | Smaller pool set |
| Tron stablecoin lending | 3.66% | 3.52% | -0.14pp | Smaller pool set |
Read the change column with a tolerance of roughly ten basis points, and this week every core row clears inside it — the first such week in our archive. Even the two rows that move most, Tron and Solana stablecoin lending, move less than last week's smallest exception. The absence of a signal is the signal: utilisation neither built on last week's lending demand nor gave it back.
Arbitrum easing to 5.20% is a two-basis-point move that leaves its spread at 1.75pp — the widest among tracked chains in every one of the ten weeks our archive covers.
3 Spread over the risk-free reference
| Strategy | Yield | Reference risk-free | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokenized T-bills | 3.45% | 3.45% | 0.00% |
| Ethereum stablecoin lending | 4.21% | 3.45% | 0.76% |
| Arbitrum stablecoin lending | 5.20% | 3.45% | 1.75% |
| Base stablecoin lending | 4.62% | 3.45% | 1.17% |
| Solana stablecoin lending | 3.95% | 3.45% | 0.50% |
| BSC stablecoin lending | 3.12% | 3.45% | -0.33% |
| TRON stablecoin lending | 3.52% | 3.45% | 0.07% |
| Solana LST | 4.91% | 3.45% | 1.46% |
| ETH LST | 2.19% | 3.45% | -1.26% |
Judged as spreads, the ordering is intact: Arbitrum pays 1.75pp, Base 1.17pp, Solana staking 1.46pp — a staking strategy out-earning most credit strategies in the sample, with a different risk content entirely — and Ethereum lending 0.76pp.
The row that should still give an allocator pause is ETH liquid staking at 2.19%, paying -1.26pp against the reference in the lending sense. That is not a flaw — staking is not a lending strategy, and its return includes token exposure rather than a credit premium. It does mean that choosing it on yield alone misreads what you are buying.
4 Lending rates by market
| Venue | Chain | Asset | APY | Pool size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sky-lending | Ethereum | SUSDS | 3.6% | $4.7B |
| maple | Ethereum | USDC | 5.2% | $2.9B |
| circle-usyc | BSC | USYC | 3.1% | $2.4B |
| ethena-usde | Ethereum | SUSDE | 5.4% | $1.2B |
| ondo-yield-assets | Ethereum | USDY | 3.6% | $1.2B |
| blackrock-buidl | Solana | BUIDL | 3.8% | $1.0B |
| maple | Ethereum | USDT | 5.7% | $0.7B |
| sparklend | Ethereum | USDS | 5.0% | $0.6B |
| invesco-ustb | Ethereum | USTB | 3.3% | $0.6B |
| aave-v3 | Ethereum | USDE | 0.1% | $0.5B |
The spread between venues inside a single chain remains wider than the spread between chains, which is the practical argument for reading pool-level rates rather than chain averages. A composite will always look like something nobody can actually deposit into.
5 Liquid staking yields
| Asset | Chain | Yield | Issuer | TVL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STETH | Ethereum | 2.2% | lido | $26.9B |
| WEETH | Ethereum | 2.3% | ether.fi-stake | $6.0B |
| RETH | Ethereum | 2.2% | rocket-pool | $1.4B |
| RSETH | Ethereum | 2.2% | kelp | $1.1B |
| CBETH | Ethereum | 2.3% | coinbase-wrapped-staked-eth | $0.5B |
| OSETH | Ethereum | 2.3% | stakewise-v3 | $0.4B |
| WSTETH | Ethereum | 0.0% | fluid-lending | $0.2B |
| ETH-STETH | Ethereum | 1.3% | curve-dex | $0.1B |
Lido remains the dominant route by size, and its rate sits close to the sample average. Where providers differ by more than about twenty basis points, the gap is usually attributable to how much of the yield comes from MEV rather than from protocol issuance — which is also the component most likely to move without warning, as the week's MetaMask Staking incident outside this dataset reminded everyone: an operator-level fee-recipient redirect cost validators their tip stream while their stake sat untouched.
6 Stablecoin yields
| Chain | TVL-weighted APY | Stablecoin TVL | Pools counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbitrum | 5.2% | $1.5B | 12 |
| Base | 4.6% | $2.3B | 12 |
| Ethereum | 4.2% | $13.8B | 13 |
| Solana | 4.0% | $1.9B | 12 |
| Tron | 3.5% | $0.6B | 3 |
| BSC | 3.1% | $2.9B | 12 |
Two things determine these levels, and only one is durable. The durable part is underlying real-world rate exposure from tokenized Treasuries. The cyclical part is perp funding, which feeds several of the higher-quoting products and can reverse in a day without anything visibly changing in the pool — and which the Ethena incentives change taking effect on 30 September puts a date against.
7 Playbook: matching strategy to mandate
| If your goal is | Consider | Accept | Avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash preservation | Tokenized T-bill funds | Issuer, custody and redemption-timing risk | Treating a redemption window as instant liquidity |
| Working capital | Blue-chip lending on Ethereum | Smart-contract and governance risk | Chasing an isolated market's premium without reading its collateral |
| Income with a risk budget | Isolated or smaller-chain lending | Collateral and chain concentration | Assuming the premium compensates for concentration by default |
| Tactical carry | Funding-linked stablecoin products | A funding regime that can flip for days | Treating a cyclical rate as structural |
| Long-horizon exposure | Liquid staking | Token price risk alongside the yield | Comparing its rate to a credit spread |
8 Formulas used
9 What we would watch next week
- Whether the tokenized T-bill reference makes it four rises in a row; at 3.45% it does the compression work on its own whenever lending stalls.
- Whether sUSDe-linked rates flinch in the first full week after Ethena's ENA incentive stop — the cleanest test of a subsidised yield we will get all quarter.
- Whether Ethereum's premium holds near 0.76pp for a third week, which would make last week's re-widening look structural rather than event-driven.
- Whether Tron's dip to 3.52% is noise, by seeing it reverse or extend on a pool set thin enough to move on one venue's reporting.
Key Takeaways
- A noise week: every core aggregate moved four basis points or less, the first such week in our archive.
- Ethereum lending held at 4.21% and its premium over T-bills held at 0.76pp, where last week's re-widening left it.
- The tokenized T-bill reference rose to 3.45% — a third consecutive weekly rise, quietly doing the compression work.
- Arbitrum remains the widest spread among tracked chains — 5.20% APY, 1.75pp over the reference — in every week of our ten-week archive.
- Solana stablecoin lending rose about 16 basis points and Tron fell about 14 — both inside the noise band their thin pool sets carry.
- Ethena ended ENA incentives on 30 September; the next editions will show whether the basis trade carries sUSDe rates without the subsidy.
10 In brief
This was a noise week, and the table proves it. Every core aggregate moved four basis points or less: Ethereum stablecoin lending rose from 4.17% to 4.21%, the tokenized T-bill reference climbed to 3.45% — its third consecutive weekly rise — and the blended stablecoin rate moved to 4.14%. The premium over the risk-free rate held at 0.76pp, where last week's re-widening left it. After two weeks of large moves in opposite directions, the market paused.
The smaller pool sets carried the week's biggest moves, and they point in both directions: Solana stablecoin lending rose about 16 basis points to 3.95% while Tron's fell about 14 to 3.52%. Both sit inside the sampling noise those thin pool sets always carry — which pools reported, how weighting shifted as TVL moved. The structure did not change; the noise did.
The one structural change worth naming came from outside the data: Ethena announced on 26 September that it will stop distributing ENA incentives that subsidise sUSDe yields, with the change taking effect on 30 September. That removes a subsidy from a slice of the stablecoin yield market, and the next few editions of this report will show whether the underlying basis trade carries the rate on its own.
Sources & Methodology
- DefiLlama yields endpoint — pool-level APY and TVL, aggregated TVL-weighted.
- Per-week archive built from each pool's own historical chart, so this edition's levels belong to the week named rather than to the day of publication.
Headlines and figures on this page are drawn from the outlets listed above; commentary is clearly labelled opinion and is not investment advice. Last reviewed 2026-10-04.